Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 30,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2009, 4:52 am
’” Boucher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:03 am
Eatinger v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
One of my favorite cases to teach is Bosley Medical Institute v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:57 am
Dissenting, Schroeder states that the petitioner did not receive a fair trial. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Sistersong Women of Reproductive Justice Collective v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
The United States District Court here in the 6th Circuit recently decided Jerman v Carlisle, 502 F Supp 2nd 686 (2007). [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 6:01 am
The United States District Court here in the 6th Circuit recently decided Jerman v Carlisle, 502 F Supp 2nd 686 (2007). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:25 pm
In Albrecht et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 5:15 am
— The Authors Guild looks at last week’s Eleventh Circuit decision in Cambridge University Press v Albert, an ongoing dispute over Georgia State University’s use of copyrighted works through its digital coursepack system. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:48 am
North Carolina is not a title-controls state. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
The Court noted that it had to strike a fair balance between the right to protection of reputation and the right to freedom of expression. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
Whereas the prosecution's story -- and a pretty persuasive one at that -- was that the victim was a total stranger, and that defendant just went off on the guy for totally no reason.The fact that the defendant was in a seriously agitated state seems relevant, since it provides a fair piece of support to the prosecution's position that the defendant had a "problem" at the time and in that state decided to go off on a total stranger. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:00 am
In Guerrero v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:47 am
The case, Stern v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
This judgment, in many respects, follows the earlier decision of Haines v Sarner [2005] EWHC 90009 (Costs), in which Simon Gibbs acted for the Defendant. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
In Lanier v. [read post]
