Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 2221 - 2240 of 3,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am by William A. Ruskin
  Until recently, the public trust doctrine has mostly been applied to protect the waters of the state – as a public resource – for purposes of commerce, fishing and recreation. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm by WIMS
      The delta smelt is a small fish endemic to the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers Delta Estuary which was declared endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act in 1993. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Conor McEvily
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Steve Davies
The Ninth Circuit today affirmed his ruling that the renewal of 41 water contracts did not violate the Endangered Species Act’s Section 7(a)(2), requiring federal agencies to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service before they proceed with major federal actions (Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
On October 18, 2007, the Copyright Board released a decision stating the royalties to be collected for the communication to the public by telecommunication, in Canada, of musical or dramatic-musical works for the years 1996 to 2006: SOCAN Tariff 22.A (Internet Online Music Services).Result: Court's HeadnoteHeld (LeBel, Fish, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. dissenting):  The appeal should be allowed. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
This case shows again that special care needs to be taken with extension states and fees, because fewer remedies are available if these are missed. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Pinkerton’s of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 132 and Resurfice Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
Judge Fallon found more useful authority in Rivera v. [read post]