Search for: "Fish v. State"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
The majority on the panel cited Kern v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm
Williams — federal habeas court duty to defer to state court ruling on a federal constitutional issue, if the state court has ruled without mentioning the issue (grant limited to Question 1) 11-597 — Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:33 am
New Massachusetts Foreclosure Prevention Law Passed Breaking: SJC Rules For Lenders and MERS In Eaton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:33 am
Related Posts: Breaking: SJC Rules For Lenders and MERS In Eaton v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:19 am
California Fish Co., 138 P. 79 (Cal. 1913); Marks v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
Until recently, the public trust doctrine has mostly been applied to protect the waters of the state – as a public resource – for purposes of commerce, fishing and recreation. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
Iqbal and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:09 pm
The delta smelt is a small fish endemic to the San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers Delta Estuary which was declared endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act in 1993. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
This blog’s online symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:53 pm
Fellegy (fishing rights)Kroner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
The Ninth Circuit today affirmed his ruling that the renewal of 41 water contracts did not violate the Endangered Species Act’s Section 7(a)(2), requiring federal agencies to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service before they proceed with major federal actions (Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
On October 18, 2007, the Copyright Board released a decision stating the royalties to be collected for the communication to the public by telecommunication, in Canada, of musical or dramatic-musical works for the years 1996 to 2006: SOCAN Tariff 22.A (Internet Online Music Services).Result: Court's HeadnoteHeld (LeBel, Fish, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ. dissenting): The appeal should be allowed. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
Here is the unpublished opinion in People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Thompson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:39 pm
In the recent case of State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:49 am
Brief Amicus Curiae of Owners' Counsel of America, Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]