Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 5,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2021, 3:33 pm
Becerra, Oregon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
In a recent Colorado case - People v Lorenzo Brooks - the defendant's conviction's conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was overturned because his out of state Texas conviction had no Colorado sex crime equivalent. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
The Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
§ 1182(d)(5).3 Biden v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
The new election law case, Harris v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
Rosenblatt (Tulsa) Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard) John Villasenor (UCLA) Eugene Volokh (UCLA) The post Amicus Brief as to § 230(c)(1) in <i>Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 2:18 am
Moreover, Harris v. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 2:17 pm
The challenger in Department of Education v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
Harry Reid (D-Nev.) [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
Harris (10-224) — state power to regulate the operation of slaughterhouses Kurns v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
Harris, 908 A.2d 196 (2006), and is designed to provide same-sex couples with the same rights granted to married couples. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:04 am
The lower court case is Brockert v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
