Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2011, 9:28 am
Hart In Azusa Land Partners v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm
"The EPA and the Department of Transportation worked with auto makers, labor unions, states like California, and environmental advocates this past spring to turn a tangle of rules into one aggressive new standard [See WIMS 4/1/10]. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Because here is a person that will: * Represent a hated individual; * Receive death threats from other wackos out there; * Be outgunned by the Department of Justice; * And move from a private practice in Southern California to Arizona in order to do it, and do it for public dollars as opposed to more lucrative private ones. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Clair Intellectual Property Consultants v Canon (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court C D California: Microsoft Word does not infringe patent claiming user interface that is ‘continuously responsive to user input’ even though the accused interface ‘from the user’s standpoint… remains continuously responsive’: Walker Digital, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Fingers crossed.But while we await developments in the Land of Lincoln, it's time to head back to the Lone Star State where the Court of Criminal Appeals, to the likely-surprise of nobody, issued its opinion this morning in State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
Labastida v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Battery, (1998); and California, J. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
As long as you do any act with the intent to arose yourself vis-a-vis a child, you're guilty.Yet no one -- not even California -- goes that far. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Bank v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:17 am
It is unclear whether or not Sigram will now head back to the EDVA, or simply follow in the footsteps of The Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
For example, in Visto Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
For example, in Visto Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Bruns v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Nursing Homes: PATIENTS SUFFER SUB-PAR CARE AT CALIFORNIA FACILITIES, CLASS ACTION SAYS, Valentine v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 12:16 am
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:14 am
In Gillett-Netting v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:11 am
The Court held in Wong v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
You know, Bush v. [read post]
