Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 2221 - 2240 of 18,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Supreme Court justices. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am by Scott Bomboy
The school did not re-hire Kennedy after the prayer controversy. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am by Philip Zelikow
  Also important is Russia’s defiance of the provisional orders issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on March 16 in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
For example, in February 2022, the California Department of Justice’s Division of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse (DMFEA) arrested 14 individuals associated with two hospice agencies for allegedly stealing more than $4.2 million from the Medicare and Medi-Cal programs. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:51 pm by Joseph Fishkin
”  (Really, in Dobbs, you’re going to rest exclusively on stare decisis? [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
For a Deeper DiveStudents need to get through finals, but if you're planning your summer reading, there are lots of interesting books, including:  Print BookReproductive rights and justice storiesedited by Melissa Murray (Professor of Law, New York University School of Law), Katherine Shaw (Professor of Law, Benjamin N. [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am by John Elwood
This week they’re replaced by three new relists, all involving government petitions in one way or another. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
  This mass practice of adoption for white people at the dawn of the Civil Rights era constituted a feature of “making race” in the U.S.: re-enforcing racial difference and white supremacy. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:01 am by Ben Johnson
If you're looking for a clean example of where the Court's willingness to limit review to a particular question caused it to get a case wrong, I suggest comparing Shapiro v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
Co. of Connecticut, 2003 WL 329054 (SDNY Feb. 13, 2003).The policyholder in Phillips did not appeal Justice Siwek’s corresponding order.Matter of Pottenburgh v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
We’re endeavoring to take that up to 4,000 per year, and that will take a number of months, maybe even a couple of years to get there because we have to get our supply chain to also crank up,” Taiclet said. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:28 pm by Michael Froomkin
Justice Barbara Pariente quoted her late colleague Justice Shaw’s statement from In re: TW that the state privacy provision “is clearly implicated in a woman’s decision of whether or not to continue her pregnancy. [read post]