Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 2221 - 2240 of 5,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Daniel Gilman
For instance, the long, long overdue “10-year” review of the FTC’s Eyeglass Rule last saw an ANPR in 2015, following a 2004 decision to leave an earlier version of the rule in place. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Questions related to this topic will assist you in beginning to explore Fourth Amendment issues.10. [read post]
First, a number of opponents of shareholder choice argue that the Commission's proxy access rule is nothing more or less than a disclosure rule and does not create substantive rights regarding either the nomination or election of directors which are matters of state corporate law. [read post]
The court determined that the procedures satisfy the FISA statute and the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
`As a general rule, failure to challenge a probation condition on constitutional [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 3:53 pm by Chuck Cosson
  I eschew the term “big data” in this blog, however, because I find the core principles of personal privacy and basic fairness persist no matter how large the data set, and both the issues and associated rules existed well before today’s innovations. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am by Richard M. Esenberg
(Decision, p. 10) (Indeed, the Open Meetings Law itself says that either house of the legislature can exempt itself from its strictures by the simple expedient of an internal rule.) [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
" In light of Judge Scheinkman's observations, this court finds that enforcing the settlement agreement is not contrary to public policy as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
  The complete meltdown of the State Senate has put that matter on hold, but in the meantime, my attention shifted to the Board of Regents. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
” (Criminal Code, s. 258(1)(c), as amended. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board considers both issues rather to be a subsidiary matter in the present case. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:25 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
On the other hand, critics asserted that the new rules will lead to an increase in the flow of money into U.S. elections through organizations described in section 501(c)(4) and (6). [read post]