Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 35,331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2019, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:20 pm
As part of the settlement, Judge Posner issued an order vacating its prior inequitable conduct decision: "By agreement of the parties, the Court vacates its Order of October 16, 2008 (Docket 857) declaring United States Patents Nos. 5,424,780 and 6,529,637 unenforceable. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:05 pm
United States District Court Judge Claudia Wilken (Northern District of California) denied defendants' motion to decertify a class alleging violations of the federal Credit Repair Organization Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:24 pm
Today's published opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:59 pm
Patent Nos. 5,965,596; 7,504,376; 7,825,084; and RE45,947 by offering to sell and selling dietary supplements containing beta-alanine in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court held that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers of the United States” whose appointments are therefore subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution for their actions to be valid. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:58 pm
Corona-Gonzalez previously had been removed and then reentered the United States to [...] [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:34 am
But a United States Magistrate Judge made a request last week which may indicate that federal courts lack jurisdiction to appoint umpires to New York appraisals.1 The magistrate judge ordered briefing on the issue, noting the following: The Court previously directed the parties to select an umpire to assist with the appraisal process. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Not to be outdone, United States... [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:21 pm
United States District Judge Richard Seeborg does not give a damn what the United States Supreme Court says, he is going to ensure no one is executed in California regardless of controlling precedent.In Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
United States District Court Judge Stephen V. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
Section 1292(c) states that "The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction— (2) of an appeal from a judgment in a civil action for patent infringement which would otherwise be appealable to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and is final except for an accounting." [read post]
18 May 2016, 2:42 pm
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
The United States Supreme Court has weighed in on two K9 cases to conclude that a sniff is a search that must be supported by probable cause, and the reliability of that search is judged under the totality of the circumstances by examining the dog’s training and performance in controlled certification and training settings. [read post]
A Sniff Is A Search By Any Other Name, But Is It Reliable? Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am
The United States Supreme Court has weighed in on two K9 cases to conclude that a sniff is a search that must be supported by probable cause, and the reliability of that search is judged under the totality of the circumstances by examining the dog’s training and performance in controlled certification and training settings. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:29 am
In a case indicating that courts may be weary of serial plaintiffs filing multiple cookie-cutter lawsuits, a United States District Judge in the Northern District of New York has ordered a plaintiff to show that she has standing to bring ADA hotel website accessibility lawsuits to federal court. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:20 pm
On June 30, 2010, Judge Susan Illston, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, held that borrowers are not intended third-party beneficiaries of the Servicer Participation Agreement and, therefore, lack standing to sue for an alleged breach of the agreement.Simmons v. [read post]
