Search for: "Laing v. United States"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
Long & Mabry (9 La. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 8:15 am
V, no. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland stated that the program reflects the Biden-Harris Administration’s commitment to clean energy and the United States’s growing offshore wind industry. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
B-DC: PACA claims are trust, not secured claims, so no req't (as per §506b) that claim be oversecured to get atty fees. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/JK-BK-DC-TEEL-10-4-11.pdf … B-AL: Truck lease w/ "Terminal Rental Adjustment Clause" (TRAC) is "true lease" and not lease intended as security. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HB-BK-ND-AL-CADDELL-9-29-11.pdf … B-OH:… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:27 am
United States, one of the most controversial United States Supreme Court decisions of the 20th century. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Parental rights extend to the right to have children,[10] the right to “direct the upbringing and education” of their children,[11] and a right to family integrity.[12] In comparison, children in the United States are left with few rights: constitutional jurisprudence has denied children an affirmative constitutional right to an education[13] and health care.[14] Where Can Children Find the Right to Consent? [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
This is an old battle and one that is hardly confined to the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Schellinger Brothers v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
ZR 27/07 (EPLAW) Appeals Court: Düsseldorf: RapidShare doesn't need to filter user uploads (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) India Tales from decrypt dept – guest post on s 65A Copyright Amendment Bill (Spicy IP) Netherlands BREIN wants Usenet provider to start filtering (TorrentFreak) File-sharers are content industry’s ‘largest customers’ (Ars Technica) United Kingdom Gmail settlement reached (Class 46) United… [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:52 am
Viteri v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Scotland Scottish Legal News has a piece by Julie Hamilton, “Defamation, social media and the right to insult” United States Lawyer Alan Dershowitz has issued libel proceedings against another lawyer, David Boies accusing him of carrying out a “war of defamation” and “engaging in a sustained campaign to subvert the judicial process for purposes of disseminating outrageous, knowingly false and defamatory claims accusing Dershowitz of sexual abuse. [read post]
