Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 2221 - 2240 of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s opinion in Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners’ Ass’n v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: The Poarch Band of Creek Indians (“Poarch Band”) sued James Hildreth, Tax Assessor of Escambia County, Alabama, for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the assessment of property taxes on lands owned by the Poarch Band in Escambia County, Alabama, and held in trust by the United States (“Trust Property”). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Therefore, the United States is entitled to summary judgment on all claims. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am by Stephanie Figueroa
§602(a)(1), allowed it to block importation of the wristwatches because it had not authorized those watches to be sold in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The United States filed an amicus brief in the Court of Appeals in the case, Jesus Christ is the Answer Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
H.R.2029: To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report on the response of law enforcement agencies to reports of missing or murdered Indians. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:56 pm by David Kopel
As Barnett explains: Spooner supplemented this interpretive claim about original public meaning with a principle of construction he took from the 1805 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Rickert, 188 U.S. 432 (1903) (tribal trust lands and improvements are exempt from state and local taxes); Moritz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
ShareYou might have expected the justices to take a breather the day after hearing the weighty arguments in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Gerard Magliocca
The third was Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:27 am by Eugene Volokh
That’s the so-called “solicitation” exception, most clearly set forth in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
What appears substantially more certain, at least to this court, is that plaintiffs have no right to relief under RLUIPA, the United States Constitution or the Wisconsin Constitution. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
This action challenges certain provisions of the [city ordnances under] ... the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm by Peter Tillers
Posner, one of the most distinguished judges in the land and a member of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, saying he was mistaken in one of the most contentious issues in American politics and jurisprudence: laws that require people to show identification before they can vote. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 11:09 am by Ben Rubin
Earlier this month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a lawsuit brought under section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) because, instead of attacking a specific project or approval, the complaint and notice of intent generally attacked all land use permit decisions by the local agency. [read post]