Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 39,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
” DLA Piper, Pinsent Masons and Mischon de Reya summarise the key changes in the proposed legislation, but suggest that there is very little material difference between the second bill and its predecessor. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
For example, the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court has not issued any decision interpreting and applying Section 7 in 50 years, and major changes in the Court’s approach to antitrust law during that time render the Court’s old decisions of little value in predicting how the Court would interpret Section 7 today. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
To the hundreds of pages of colorful paintings and drawings created by Gitmo prisoners, the military added hundreds of little white redactions. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 8:58 am
–Rogers v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
R.; Iredale v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:37 pm
In Twitter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
But I must say that it's a little strange coming from an en banc decision in which Judge Bumatay's opinion on the matter gets outvoted 10-1, without a single judge on the en banc panel -- even those judges who typically vote alongside Judge Bumatay -- adopting his position in this one.Sometimes you're totally convinced you're right even though the rest of the world, including some very bright people, says you're wrong. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 10:23 am
The Grand Chamber in the case of LB v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 8:23 am
Krikor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Proponents of adhering strictly to classic (or “absolute”) neutrality rules, such as those outlined in the 1907 Hague Conventions V and XIII Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land and in Naval War, argue that certain types of support violates neutral States’ legal obligations of abstention (or non-participation) and impartiality and thereby constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
That ruling--and especially the opinion of then-Court President Aharon Barak--has sometimes been called the Marbury v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:54 pm
” The fact of the matter is that the Bahamas has little interest, experience or skill in investigating and prosecuting crimes on cruise ships involving U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
Among other things, they conclude that there is little reason for concern that the “Zooming” of litigation degrades the already-low truth-detection capacities of judges or juries. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Whether one agrees with the FDA or AHM on whether it is a good idea for mifepristone to be widely available, there is little doubt about how the underlying legal issues in AHM v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:48 am
The nearly three-hour discussion between the justices and the attorneys yielded little in the way of a viable test. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Unfortunately, turning to the applicable Supreme Court of Canada decisions offers little guidance. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 8:33 pm
Yes, it is a little bit complicated, but so is chemistry. [read post]
