Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2012, 9:38 pm
Which State Law Controls Whether a Dissolved Corporation Lacks the Capacity To Be Sued? [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
He clearly and explicitly stated that outright withdrawal from the Convention was one of the options he was considering – the first time I have heard a sitting Lord Chancellor float this possibility. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
Further, it is established law that it is for the domestic law of Member States to ensure the effective protection of rights under Community law. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
So when a Court of Appeal decision was recently delivered in Hollister Incorporated and Dansac A/S v Medik Ostomy Supplies Limited [2012] EWCA 1419, she wiggled with excitement, made some peppermint tea with her beloved Tea Pigs and got to highlighting the 108 paragraph judgment delivered by Lord Justice Kitchin that held that His Honour Judge Birss QC was incorrect in the method by which he calculated Hollister's damages for trade mark infringement based… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
Let me quote two paragraphs from one of Judge Koh's claim construction orders in Apple v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm
and Lord Hoffmann, commenting on the decision in Bieber, observed that Article 3 was prescribing the minimum standard, not a norm. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
That is the sort of rule of law Lord Wilberforce had in mind when he dismissed the “the superimposition of a judicially invented rule of law”. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
In 1964 the US Supreme Court as New York Times Co v Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 recognised that the First Amendment applied to state laws on defamation. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Per Lord Justice Rix:"I ... wonder whether this case illustrates a powerful but also troubling example of the state exercising its precautionary responsibilities for a much loved child in the face of parenting whose unsatisfactory nature lies not so much in the area of physical abuse but in the more subjective area of moral and emotional risk. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am
Your case will mostly be affected by recent published opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 4:27 pm
Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:34 am
The Gray v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor case - see below. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
The court on December 4 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Bourhis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:56 am
Lord Justice Elias gave the lead Judgment and found in favour of Clyde & Co. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The Lord said, “I will not destroy it for the ten’s sake. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
These were most famously set out by Lord Bingham in by the House of Lords in R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC HL [at 31]: The purposes of such an investigation are clear: to ensure so far as possible that the full facts are brought to light; that culpable and discreditable conduct is exposed and brought to public notice; that suspicion of deliberate wrongdoing (if justified) is allayed; that dangerous practices and… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Appellants) v Yunus Rahmatullah (Respondent) The Supreme Court has ruled that the law of habeas corpus should not be used to order the US to return a Pakistani national held in US custody to the UK. [read post]
