Search for: "MATTER OF INQUIRY INTO M M"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
What we do not know matters. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:59 am
These positions reflected a shared understanding that intellectual inquiry requires an environment in which debate is uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, even if it occasionally results in unpleasant or offensive exchanges. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm
”[6] The question thus arises: who were those “reputable” dealers, and how does it matter that a private purchaser like White is in good faith? [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
But while you would normally think that a ruling on such an important question by a court as important as the Second Circuit would be a big deal, I’m not sure the Second Circuit’s opinion actually matters very much. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 4th District.Criminal law -- First-degree grand theft -- Jury instructions -- Good faith defense -- Trial court erred in refusing to give requested special instructions on good faith, the lack of criminal implications for a disagreement regarding contract interpretation, and the definition of “petroleum contaminated water” (PCW) set forth in the Florida Administrative Code, where defendants, under contract to remove water contaminated with jet fuel from… [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:13 pm
For another: I'm not going anywhere. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 10:04 am
“Well, there’s really only one that matters,” McBurney retorts. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Schiavenza, Assistant Attorney General, Steven M. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 10:05 am
[Cross-posted at Tech Liberation Front] Milton Mueller responded to my post Wednesday on the DOJ’s decision to halt the AT&T/T-Mobile merger by asserting that there was no evidence the merger would lead to “anything innovative and progressive” and claiming “[t]he spectrum argument fell apart months ago, as factual inquiries revealed that AT&T had more spectrum than Verizon and the mistakenly posted lawyer’s letter revealed that it… [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
A party may file a motion alleging a Rule 11 violation against another party (a regrettably involved process) or the judge may make an inquiry on his or her own initiative. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
And if people are buying that, and it’s working with the bank, then I’m in favor of saying it. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm
Vivek Ramaswamy's and Jed Rubenfeld's Jan. 11 Wall Street Journal op-ed suggests the answer is yes; and on reflection, I think there is a good argument for a version of that position, though I'm not sure whether I'm persuaded by it myself. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 10:01 am
Milton Mueller responded to my post Wednesday on the DOJ’s decision to halt the AT&T/T-Mobile merger by asserting that there was no evidence the merger would lead to “anything innovative and progressive” and claiming “[t]he spectrum argument fell apart months ago, as factual inquiries revealed that AT&T had more spectrum than Verizon and the mistakenly posted lawyer’s letter revealed that it would be much less expensive to expand its… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:33 pm
(I'm not talking about testilying or beating the shit out of innocent people or shooting pets while executing search warrants or arresting folks for tape recording what cops say to them or planting evidence . . . ; you know, this is garden-variety, high-school peeking at someone else's answer sheet while taking a multiple choice test.) [read post]
21 May 2009, 9:34 am
I'm sorry we had to break up, Kroll, but you never wanted to do anything but talk shop and stay in on weekends. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
So, I’m primed to assume that things are going to change a lot. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
The same is true of statements that "[m]ost" sitting judges go to the same church and are related by marriage. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
So, I’m primed to assume that things are going to change a lot. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
Rather, the FTC found that a determination as to whether such entity is exempt from liability under CAN-SPAM would require a "highly fact specific inquiry. [read post]
3 May 2008, 5:20 am
Stage Two is critically important if our inquiry is into the linguistic meaning (or semantic content) of the Constitution. [read post]
