Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 2221 - 2240 of 120,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In these cases, custom representations and warranties may be useful like (i) infringement of and rights to Training Data, (ii) ownership of AI technology, (iii) ownership and protectability of output developed using AI technology tools or software, (iv) licenses to inputs from AI technology, and (v) separate copyright and patent representations and warranties related to AI technology, as needed. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
Like many decisions driven by ideology this one is more likely to diminish the usefulness of the internet for everyone than to improve its usefulness for those who are disabled. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
Like many decisions driven by ideology this one is more likely to diminish the usefulness of the internet for everyone than to improve its usefulness for those who are disabled. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch and Timothy Knight On May 9, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The Commissioner may accept additional evidence “upon good cause shown and such terms and conditions as the commissioner may specify” (8 NYCRR 276.5). [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:44 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
  Although the risk of bushfires may have contributed to the timing of the decision to cancel the festival the decision would probably have been made in any event. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am by Stephen Rosenberg
I would suggest that if it is the former, and not the latter, it may be time to reexamine the question. [read post]