Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2221 - 2240 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Entonces me fui e hice algo que me parecía más gratificante: pensar y discutir sobre las cosas que son más complejas, importantes y más recompensadoras. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The plea concerning Article 7(3), which excludes the applicability of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) if the trade mark has acquired distinctiveness through use, was declared inadmissible, as the Board of Appeal had not ruled on the matter, but merely remitted the question to the Examination Division. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
Here is section 274(m)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.): No deduction shall be allowed under this chapter (other than section 217 [relating to moving expenses]) for travel expenses paid or incurred with respect to a spouse, dependent, or other individual accompanying the taxpayer (or an officer or employee of the taxpayer) on business travel, unless— (A) the spouse, dependent, or other individual is an employee of the taxpayer, (B) the travel of the spouse,… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Under section 469(c)(7)(B), a taxpayer is a real estate professional if two conditions are satisfied. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Mr & Mrs M were approaching retirement and were found to be not wealthy. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am by NL
Mr & Mrs M were approaching retirement and were found to be not wealthy. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am by Michael Froomkin
(He got a C on the paper proposing the campaign, by the way.) [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:27 am by INFORRM
Clause 1 of Hacked Off’s bill says: (1) Ministers of the Crown and public officials with responsibility for matters relating to the media must uphold the freedom of the press and its independence from parliament and the executive. (2) Ministers of the Crown and such public officials must have regard to– (a) the importance of the freedom and independence of the media; (b) the right of the media to receive and impart information without interference by public authorities;… [read post]