Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 119,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2011, 9:21 am
Any lower standard, he suggests, would convert what should be state murder prosecutions into federal crimes and would violate the rule of lenity. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Now in Vance v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 11:40 pm
" Honeywell International Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:18 am
So held the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Subway Franchise System of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 11:30 am
Though it's not the law in the Northern District of New York.Teddy bears throughout the Golden State rejoice. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:27 am
Because theHolocaust Victims Redress Act, according to Judge Thomas, doesn't create a private right of action (which seems pretty right) and the plaintiffs' state law claims are time-barred (ditto).Art law. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
On 2 May 2023 Collins Rice J heard a case management hearing in the case of Nagi v Santhiramoulesan. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
Apte v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:06 am
Here is the opinion: Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion An excerpt: Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s sovereign immunity, and the district court lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:55 am
Although the challengers in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
In Soleimani v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 1:29 am
Colvin (10th Cir., May 1, 2015) (affirming denial of social security, disability benefits, and disabled widows benefits based on weight given to the treating physician's testimony)Public EmployeesHollenbach v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
Toth v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:04 pm
In Norris v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
However, said the court, "if it appears that the state issues substantially predominate, whether in terms of proof, the scope of the issues raised, or of the comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, the state claims may be dismissed without prejudice and left for resolution to state tribunals. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:24 am
SCOV issued three opinions May 8. [read post]
