Search for: "Mrs Jones"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
Mr. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:01 am
The filing adds that “Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm
" Lord Justice Mummery, the Chairman of the evening's lecture, in introducing Mrs. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 8:43 am
Mr. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
In Jones, the court stated: Neither Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
According to the opinion for the court by Justice Jones, Mr. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:33 am
" The court should have said that the Jones case was a mistake; but even if the court doesn't believe Jones is wrong, saying liability can attach when a website "effectively controls" third party content isn't supported by Jones or by the law generally. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
[he] has insinuated himself into the very fabric of Mrs. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Wilson, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:50 am
“This is serious stuff,” Mr. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
The photographs that followed went on to become internationally known – featuring in a wildlife book by Mr Slater. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
After Marley died intestate in 1981, Mr Blackwell and Island (working with his estate) sought to safeguard his legacy by acquiring the rights in his works. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
Mr Conran has also quoted ACID statistics that “94% of those canvassed said copying was blatant and deliberate”, which to this Kat suggests that this assessment has been very subjective. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
Mr. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Some case law would be welcome to clarify the position to performers of Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
Jones and Ms. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
Thanks Laura Jones for delivering us the very detailed report. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:19 am
Mr. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
Jones") to go under the earphones, but today all the Mr. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
Back then Mr Justice Floyd held that, of the three patents at issue, all were valid, two were not infringed, and one was infringed and a geeky non-designation point was dismissed (more on that below). 16 months, nine barristers and three law firms later, the Court of Appeal upheld Mr Justice Floyd’s decision in its entirety. [read post]
