Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
So where does that leave us? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
. . .Less clear is the scope of information encompassed by PII, and how, precisely, this information must identify a person. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
On the evidentiary dispute, concerning the use of statistical evidence, the government — like Tyson — relied upon the Court’s 1946 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
Slattery therefore had to search the phone by hand and photograph what he found.Slattery first went through the phone's standard text messages. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
Causation need not be determined by scientific precision. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 10:12 am
” Together, these revisions would bring us back (in several circuits) to a likelihood of dilution standard, make that standard uniform, more precisely define dilution, and give owners of famous marks a much better idea how to avail themselves of federal protection. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am
Melvin Lloyd Co., 315 US 561 (1942), are precisely the sort of abuses that were prevented by the Supreme Court’s decisions on § 1400(b) and that would be prevented once again with a return to those controlling precedents. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
In Papish v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
” It is my sense that NFIB v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
R. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
In Akamai v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 10:05 am
In Akamai v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
Grimaldiperhaps attempts precisely this: to graft onto the tort a set of things kind of like fair use (also see analogy to TM law). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 3:55 pm
That was the message from the Third Circuit on Tuesday when it told the plaintiffs in Hassan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Abstract The use of humour by judicial officers is subject to formal and informal regulation. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
A glimpse into that future may be found in Buckley v. [read post]
