Search for: "People v. Commons" Results 2221 - 2240 of 14,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Justice Federico further noted that limiting the rights of young people, particularly regarding weapons, is well established in common law, and thus found no constitutional issue with setting the minimum age at 21 rather than 18. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:56 am by Rosalind English
Ruddy v Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police & Anor [2012] UKSC 57 – read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that an individual who claimed to have been assaulted by police officers was entitled to bring an action in the sheriff court (Scotland) seeking  damages at common law and under the Human Rights Act 1998 against the relevant chief constable arising from the officer’s actions. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:36 pm by Robert A. Epstein
One of the most common questions people ask when settling their divorce matter is, how do we figure out what the child support payment is going to be? [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Therefore, the common law cannot be religion-based, and everyone must follow it. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
 The common theme is increasing restrictions on the ability of ordinary people (or small businesses in some cases) to challenge illegal actions by large companies and governments. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
  Barbour clearly established that this State’s common law supports the ability of married people to contract during their marriage regarding their marital rights and bligations in divorce. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Defamatory meaning and serious harm Warby J had no difficulty finding that the statements satisfied the common law test of what is defamatory. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]