Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 2221 - 2240 of 5,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The US Supreme Court has good news for people that are tired of paying high prices for printer cartridges – the fine print of the “license agreement” in the boxes that prohibits you from refilling the cartridges is no longer effective. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The US Supreme Court has good news for people that are tired of paying high prices for printer cartridges – the fine print of the “license agreement” in the boxes that prohibits you from refilling the cartridges is no longer effective. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The new space will allow each side to have 16 attorneys in the court room at a time, and it can accommodate a total of 132 people. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Roger Fairfax looks at Nelson v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 5:41 pm by Robert Chesney
  So what exactly are these people claiming? [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Conservatives have said that they want to give people the power to demand that social media sites delete material that was posted when the user was under eighteen. [read post]
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
While Congress continues to debate the future of the Obamacare health reforms and its exchanges, the Department of Health & Human Services is reminding employers with less than 50 employees that wish to offer group health coverage for their employees to check out their coverage options offered the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplace established as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:22 am by Michael Lowe
  These are not criminal matters, as a general rule so there’s no jail time or monetary fines at issue here. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Subsection (1) provides that a “person who publishes or utters blasphemous matter” shall be guilty of an offence; anyone guilty of the offence is liable to a fine not exceeding €25,000. [read post]