Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES" Results 2221 - 2240 of 5,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Harris, 19-466Issues: (1) Whether in Scott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Harris has supported these state laws and certainly did not answer the question on what limits she would support, other than saying that she supports Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Based on People v Elufe, People v Fiumefreddo and People v Harris, to effectuate a valid guilty plea the defendant must enter the plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 The White House also disclosed that Vice President Kamala Harris met with a group of constitutional law professors on Tuesday. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
That is the threat posed by state power in our century. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to petitioners' contention, however, the petition fails to state a cause of action for fraud or constructive fraud against either HSBC or respondent law firm because it fails to make a "factually supported allegation" of misrepresentation (Pope v Saget, 29 AD3d 437, 441, lv denied 8 NY3d 803; see Simmons v Washing Equip. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 5:47 pm
Patrick Leahy and Harry Reid voted for it. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]