Search for: "Samuels v. State"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:41 pm
Today, though, in Horne v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:00 pm
The Senate votes today on codifying Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
” See, e.g., Samuel Isaacharoff, Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act a Victim of Its Own Success? [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
Though the question presented was quite narrow and technical, the split in Artis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:34 am
Feinberg v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:32 am
Justice Samuel Alito dissented, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am
Similarly, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Samuel Alito (a rare combination!) [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
Levine Samuel, LLP Gerald M. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
By a vote of 6-3, the Court held in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:15 am
ShareThe Supreme Court’s Monday decision in Goldman Sachs Group v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm
The Second Circuit affirmed the decision, relying on the court’s earlier decision in Cartoon Network LP v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:04 pm
Justice Samuel Alito was skeptical, but for a different reason. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
James School v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck provided a primer on the merits issues in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
United States, the justices turned down a request to decide whether to overrule the court’s 2005 decision in National Cable Telecommunications Association v. [read post]