Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 6:24 am
In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm
In short, Nevada’s DACA recipients, in reliance on the program, have provided great benefits to the state. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
United States in 2001); and even one’s own front porch (Florida v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
"United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:46 am
The case, Broadnax v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:33 am
The commission in charge of the funds conducted a competitive bidding process with various banks for their short-term deposits. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:02 am
As usual, the Court issued a very short orders list later the same day, taking up a single case, and a long list today turning down many cases.The case taken up Friday wasTanzin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:34 am
The Respondent was a citizen of both the United States and El Salvador. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
Such a head-scratching, impractical rule cannot be reconciled with the United States Supreme Court’s class action decisions in cases such as Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:52 am
Appellate Court Determines Who is Responsible for Previous Costs A recent case from Cook County, Shannon Court Condominium Association v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Unfortunately, the patentability requirements are frequently misunderstood, including by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Hillary Byrnes is Assistant General Counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
