Search for: "Single Source Inc" Results 2221 - 2240 of 2,242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 8:26 am
But if the organization was corrupt, why are the chief financial officer and controller being singled out by the SEC? [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:05 pm
Magazine covers have been awarded trade dress protection,Time Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Plaintiffs HER, Inc., Real Living, Inc., Harley E. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
This policy should be implemented on a consistent basis, across all sources of electronically stored information. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
Mentions: SearchInform Technologies Inc. web site | Socha Consulting listing [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
That includes Nazi skulls.The concept of "plagiarizing" a trademark per se is an interesting one, as a trademark is supposed to be recognized by itself as indicating a single source (i.e., the trademark is its own "citation. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
See Crossroads Electric, Inc., 343 NLRB 1 [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 9:15 am
Mentions: SearchInform Technologies Inc. web site | Socha Consulting listing [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 1:05 pm
Contacts LexisNexis Marc Osborn, 425-460-2159 marc.osborn@lexisnexis.com At A Glance LexisNexis Source: via Business Wire Updated   03/03/2006   by company Mentions: LexisNexis Applied Discovery Inc. - web site | Socha Consulting listing [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The majority further wrote: "The Board did not specifically find the natural gas pipelines to be public utilities per se, but nonetheless found that the public utility systemwide presumption should apply because the pipelines are relied on as the source of supply for public utilities. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 12:34 pm
US Patent 6969504 - Rice University, priority - Sept. 8, 1995Claim 1 - "An electrical conductor comprising single-wall carbon nanotubes, wherein at least 10% of the single-wall carbon nanotubes in the electrical conductor are armchair single-wall carbon nanotubes. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 11:42 am
Congress amplified the penalties for "indecent" broadcasts to $325,000 per violation up to a ceiling of $3 million "for any single act. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 5:09 am
" 172 USPQ at 397.The Board noted that the more recent phantom mark ruling in In re International Flavors and Fragrances Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1513 (Fed. [read post]