Search for: "State v Matthews"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,605
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
However, New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew F. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:36 pm
Brady v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:36 pm
Brady v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am
No big surprise there, as Snider v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:56 am
But they note that the Court’s five-four decision in Vance v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:44 pm
Matthew Sag, Copyright Trolling: An Empirical Study Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceCopyright TrollsRelated Cases: AF Holdings v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
In 2012, the state Court of Appeals entertained Constitutional challenges brought by Vermitsky in another case, Filipowski v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 7:58 am
Edge won in State v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Defense Attorneys: Matthew Scott Owen and Daniel S. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
So this moggy is enormously grateful to his EIP colleague Matthew Jones, for preparing a report of this case, which came out at the same time as the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:03 pm
Missing Faith in Batson: Continued Discrimination Against African Americans Through Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges Christie Stancil Matthews Abstract: African Americans continue to be routinely and disproportionately excluded from juries over a quarter of a century after the United States Supreme Court, in Batson v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:08 am
Laura Ortuondo, 33, formerly of San Diego, California, pleaded guilty before Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:59 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:00 am
Matthews, (TX App., May, 8, 2014), a Texas state appellate court dismissed as moot a once widely followed suit brought by parents of high school cheerleaders. [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:14 am
This means that if the federal judges (who interpret the Constitution every day) know in their heart of hearts that the defendant did not get a fair trial, they have to sustain the conviction if "fairminded jurists could disagree" about the state court's proper application of constitutional precedent.The case is Matthews v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Christoph Schreuer, Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile: Barely an Annulment ArticlesCarolyn B. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
Doraisamy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
