Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 9,594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 7:09 pm
My client, a 36 year old woman residing outside the state of New Jersey had no way to provide that information to her doctors. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
A federal district court’s recent ruling in Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:50 pm
” Ramirez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
Sources: Georgia Department of Health Prescription Drug Monitoring Program “More than 1,000 doctors violating state opioid law” Atlanta Journal Constitution [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
Such a change would likely require changes to the federal and state constitutions. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:31 am
An opinion out of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week entitled, State of Texas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Facts: This case (Hobdy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm
The following are just a few examples from cases in the state of New York: Tobin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:43 am
Facts: This case (Barnett, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
The Supreme Court opened its January session Monday morning with argument in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
State Law Developments – During 2018, states across the U.S. continued reassessing and amending their data privacy and security regulations. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
With anaesthetic, in Sri Lanka it would require a co-operative doctor willing to proceed in a clandestine matter. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:34 am
Palka v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 7:28 am
Klein v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
The law is not as clear in Maine, as the state’s highest court has not adopted the Luhrmann standard, and in fact a 2013 Maine Superior Court ruling rejected the standard in Campbell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Exch. v. [read post]
