Search for: "State v. Field" Results 2221 - 2240 of 11,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 11:51 am by Dan Filler
 But it also provides stiff tonic to policy advocates who imagined that states might choose to be thoughtful about race and capital punishment notwithstanding Justice Powell's legendary wimp-out decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:34 pm
    Reasons for judgement were released today (Critchley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 3:57 am by INFORRM
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments  in the field. ● Upcoming Event – U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
This case concerns the Bonga oil field, 120km off the coast of Nigeria, where Shell extracts oil using a mobile oil rig. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:03 am
Although such a bill might therefore be said to not be a "law" for constitutional purposes, the "enrolled bill rule," created by the Supreme Court in 1892 in Marshall Field & Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendations in Tsaganea v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am by Kalvis Golde
Briefly: At The Oklahoman (via How Appealing), Chris Casteel reports that in a brief filed last week in McGirt v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:45 am
Here are some NY state cases this week in Legal Malpractice:1.Max Markus Katz, et al., appellants, v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., respondent. [read post]