Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 45,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
Relying on language in Eldred v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 12:10 am
NO-FAULT - DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTION - REMOVAL - MOTION TO REMAND FROM FEDERAL BACK TO STATE COURTAVA Acupuncture, P.C. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:59 pm
Shortly after Riegel v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:41 am
To do otherwise, the state argues, would be to reassert a due process formalism long rejected by the court. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
App makers have long complained that the fee and other practices are unfair.Scotus has more here. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
Clayworth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Franklin v. 2 Guys From Long Pond, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Since at least 1924, when the Supreme Court endorsed it in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
On December 15, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Heien v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:26 pm
AEDPA's reasonableness standards protect state courts' authority over state criminal convictions. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
___ Case citation: Rosenbach v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:01 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am
Consequently, states are spending great sums on expert witnesses to defend informed-consent, waiting-period and other laws the court has long upheld. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
