Search for: "State v. Race" Results 2221 - 2240 of 8,673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
However, the Court was not satisfied there was any flaw in the Council's decision making. 'Due regard' under s.71 Race Relations Act meant appropriate in the circumstances ( Baker v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141), including the countervailing factors. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
  Instead, Kennedy emphasized, the question before the Court is whether voters can choose to prohibit state universities from considering race. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:41 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  In support of its ruling, the Seventh Circuit cited the United States Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
” Elsewhere at the Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks at last Friday’s grant in Wittman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 8:31 pm by Josh Blackman
The states gave Clement a flat fee of $250,000 to be shared by the twenty-six states. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
Cromartie (2001) -- race-based redistrictingRogers v. [read post]