Search for: "State v. Rose" Results 2221 - 2240 of 2,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm by georgbrem
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
v=NsJHqstPuNo     UPDATE: Governor Branstad signed the bill into law. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint in the securities class action lawsuit described below alleges that based on these initiatives, the company’s share price rose more than 500% between August 2017 and January 2018. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: The state had sent notice of an alleged violation before the suit was filed—that's enough to say an action had commenced. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
”[33] The confusing aspects of the UIEGA, due to conflicting State and Federal law, and the proposed legislation which would permit internet poker, mean that the legal battle over internet gambling has yet to play out. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
Rose, Jim Miller, Elaine Kamarck and Maya MacGuineas will be on the panel. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm by Gordon Ahl
Michael Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Rose Gottemoeller, the former NATO deputy secretary general; and Pranay Vaddi, a fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:00 pm
A more extensive discussion on competitive exclusion and consumer perceptions was recently published by Rose (2009) as a White Paper. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am by Adam White
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In cases involving prisoners held without charge at the American naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and the mentally retarded on death row, his version of American justice propelled by common sense and moral clarity commanded a majority.In perhaps the most significant case, Hamdan. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
” | Williams Mullen – bit.ly/yVP7EM (Monica McCarroll, Stephen Anthony) Ooops, They Did it Again – Jurors Continue to Improperly Use Internet, and Courts Struggle with Solutions – bit.ly/wmffPX (Gibbons) Pippins Court Affirms Need for Cooperation and Proportionality in eDiscovery – bit.ly/AuGsUO (Philip Favro) Planning is Key in Corporate Fraud Risk Management – bit.ly/x02ZBG (Catherine Dunn) SOPA and PIPA Have Been Shelved | eDiscovery Law Alert –… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Box 100 Hebron, CT 06248-0100 Phone: (860) 228-9438; (800) 832-4409 (Toll Free) E-mail: johnq@eastersealsofct.org Web: http://www.ct.easter-seals.org Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center of Central Connecticut, Inc. 158 State Street, P.O. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The European Commission has so far not reciprocated with a similar regime and has instead continued to push for UK firms to submit an application for authorisation in the relevant Member State where they wish to conduct business. [read post]