Search for: "State v. Square" Results 2221 - 2240 of 5,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm by Phillips & Associates
The Madison Square Garden Co., et al., No. 1:17-cv-04000, 1st am. complaint (S.D.N.Y., Jul. 14, 2017); Kelly v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:23 pm by Guest Author
Put differently, the MQD does not cripple the administrative state at all. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Query: how does the Court’s rulings in the preemption area square with its recent notions concerning federalism and the strong role of state rights in that system? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  In almost seven intervening years, the court has failed to address the issue squarely, although not for want of trying. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:45 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinion for the court squarely rejects that understanding. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 6:24 am by Jackie McDermott
”  Rikelman and Foster also discussed how the June case might square with the precedent set by the Court in its last major abortion case—Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Finally, Rockland County stated a broader concern that the case involves issues of exceptional importance to the public because the panel excused the FAA from complying with important procedural protections under 4(f) and NEPA which has the effect of depriving 30 million people living in 31,180 square miles of five affected states from fully participating in a decision that affects the amount of noise they experience and the parks they enjoy. [read post]