Search for: "State v. Wells"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 67,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Will the warnings about polygamy come true as well? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:24 am
These devices include, of course, the separation of powers and federalism, as well as the pluralistic principle of church-state separation, correctly understood. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
" Whitman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:43 pm
Makes sense, and a well-known principle.But, here, the defendant removes (frivolously), gets remanded, and then later removes again. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
It is a well-settled principle of statutory interpretation that a statute will not be construed to burden states in the exercise of their traditional powers unless it clearly states its intent to do so. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 7:20 pm
It doesn't bode well for you when the very first paragraph of the Court of Appeal's factual statement includes the following two sentences: "[Plaintiff] has filed in excess of 400 such actions in state and federal court, and has been declared a vexatious litigant in both jurisdictions. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:32 pm
Check the U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 5:08 am
I now shamelessly crib from a lower court decision by Justice Walter Tolub in 2006 against Comptroller Hevesi and the State (citations have been omitted):It is well settled that the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for money damages against the State, State agencies, or State officials acting in their official capacities in the exercise of governmental functions. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
United State ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:54 am
Mayo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
“There is no question here that both sides can well afford to litigate in the High Court. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
Moreover, if the Supreme Court decides Türkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 10:00 am
Aug. 2, 2021) Search Our Site The post Legal v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
" But it "was clear both newbies, neither of whom has prior judicial experience, had researched the issues deeply beforehand and arrived well-versed" in the cases; they "posed factual questions, tossed off references to case law and state code with apparent fluency, and posed a few hypotheticals. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
A well executed and timely student note. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:27 am
The decision, issued in Utah v. [read post]
