Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 2221 - 2240 of 3,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2024, 7:26 am by Stephen E. Sachs
But just as the attack on Nancy Kerrigan served only as indirect and limited evidence of the rules of United States Figure Skating, lawyers' rhetorical use of history serves only as indirect and limited evidence of the content of American law. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:40 am by Eugene Volokh
" Hernden alleges that Defendant Frank Bednard—member and president of the Board— then forwarded Hernden's email to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) with a complaint about her behavior. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:54 am by Christopher Walker
United States, he does not engage with the court’s thorny prior precedent on this point that Aditya Bamzai attempted to distinguish in his law-professor amicus brief. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
Wilson, Esq., attorney in private practice (Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP); Stephen P. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
(Criminal Penalties and Lack of Warrant Procedure Held to be Key Failings of Ordinance)By: Stephen D. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
LED Technologies Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) It’s all fun and games until someone goes to jail – Ugg Boots – trademark and copyright infringement case, contempt of court: Deckers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
LED Technologies Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) It’s all fun and games until someone goes to jail – Ugg Boots – trademark and copyright infringement case, contempt of court: Deckers v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Stephens 15-187Issue: (1) Whether a federal court of appeals is authorized to review sua sponte and invalidate an order reopening the time to appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6), when the appellee never appealed the order; (2) whether attorney abandonment, which Maples v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
”Lea V., law professor emerita  “I’m very grateful to Cornell LII and its tireless staff for providing free and up-to-date access to the United States Code and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence, plus its US Supreme Court advance sheets provided under its Hermes Project. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
The United States also filed an amicus brief supporting the challengers. [read post]