Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2007, 3:25 pm
It's the province of The Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
The Supreme Court has interpreted the First Amendment as establishing the rights both to speak anonymously and to be able to preserve the anonymity of one's associations. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
It's interesting that a piece of legislation passed in the wake of then-Judge Bork's Supreme Court confirmation hearing ended up being influential in this context. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
Coincidence that today's email followed on the heels of the Court's denial of cert? [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
NLRB (1937), the Court rejected (5-4) the AP's argument that it had a First Amendment right to bar its editors from "union activity or agitation for collective bargaining with employees. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
What an utter disaster, and a blight on the notion that our legal system can be trusted with people's lives.And no, the fact that the murder conviction was dismissed on the subsequent §440.10 motion doesn't mean "no harm, no foul. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
The Constitution's Appointments Clause provides: [The President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
But before the Supreme Court, that advocacy vanished. [read post]
13 Apr 2025, 1:14 pm
MOre specifically, the President's attack on the core self conceptions of the structures and institutions of the of enterprise of law as it is performed in courts and attended to by lawyers guided by academics (when it suites either). [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 4:19 pm
And Quirin turned into a debacle when the Supreme Court found itself unable to write a sound ex-post opinion that made sense of a rush to judgment. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 6:20 pm
There's much speculation about how it works and how specific the info given to the court is. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:34 am
" "He doesn't have what lawyers like to call ‘robeitis,'" observed Greenville's John Kittredge, a state Court of Appeals judge who first came to know Wilkins as a teenager working in his first campaign for solicitor. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:20 pm
The court said that, for a set of beliefs to be a religion, they need to be both “sincerely held” and also “in the believer’s ‘own scheme of things, religious.'” That’s true even if the asserted religion is not “acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” or is even downright “preposterous” to non-adherents. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:27 pm
At the same time, however, the court's discretion in approving lead counsel is limited. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm
The fact [they] observed Javier Blue's name on [his] cell phone clearly falls under the rubric of `plain view’ and is thus there is no `search’ of the cell phone's Caller ID for Fourth Amendment purposes. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 4:41 pm
Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote a dissent to the Court's refusal to review Stewart's case, joined by Justice William Brennan. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:27 am
Worse, the book had innumerable factoid digressions (particularly about people whose lives intersected with Arnstein) that also seem designed to show off the author's historical knowledge. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
But could this be a ground to stay or reverse the High Court's judgment? [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
You know that, and you don't want people to get hurt while time's a wasting. [read post]
