Search for: "T. STEWART" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 4:47 pm by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) In my first post about NIST’s draft cybersecurity framework I explained its basic problem as a spur to better security:  It doesn’t actually require companies to do much to improve their network security. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by Susan Schneider
She didn’t put the language in the bill and doesn’t support it, either." [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Stewart responded that probably not because money damages are involved. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:24 pm by Dave Wieneke
But there’s a non-theoretical limit where you have to call it, as Slack Co-Founder, Stewart Butterfield did, “horseshit”. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:14 pm by AndreaKWelker
Image:  duck.jpg I spent Saturday evening with a bag of popcorn and a movie: the Royal Shakespeare Company’s 2009 production of Hamlet starring David Tennant and Patrick Stewart. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:29 pm by Stewart Baker
Speaking of feel-good laws that are full of liability land mines, the Supreme Court has let stand a Ninth Circuit ruling that allows blind people to sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act if websites don't accommodate their needs. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 12:02 pm by Stewart Baker
All I can say is thank God she hasn't gone into podcasting; the Cyberlaw Podcast wouldn't stand a chance. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:55 pm by Stewart Baker
All the hacking and extortion investigations that Bezos managed trump up are over now, and the verdict is in: The Saudis didn't do it. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 7:56 am by MBettman
I don’t know why, but we all seem to love lists. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by David Markus
Stewart, 686 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir. 2012) (rejecting First Amendment challenge to sentence based in part on the defendant’s public comments, which expressed a lack of remorse, because those comments were “legally relevant to a determination of the appropriate sentence to impose”); Kapadia v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:10 am by The Book Review Editor
But Stewart failed to challenge Goldsmith’s premise of “endless war. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:42 am by SHG
He knows how § 1001 works, having been the Assistant United States Attorney who famously wielded it against Martha Stewart. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he testimony of a party at the trial of the action, adverse to his cause, may be binding upon him as a judicial admission. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
  It's because what Potter Stewart said forty years ago in Furman remains true today. [read post]