Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 2221 - 2240 of 9,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Two not-very-sufficient measures used most commonly, she said, were speed and money. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am by Nicholas Weaver
This clearly qualifies as "metadata" under Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:06 am by Dennis Crouch
 At least at a rhetoric level, this argument makes tremendous sense – the word “patent” itself references a publicly documented grant by a sovereign – something that seems awfully close to a statute. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:47 pm by Joy Waltemath
The parties were in agreement that the eight-factor test, articulated by the Missouri Court of Appeals in Nunn v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Secondly, the case involves a novel use of the representative action procedure under CPR 19.6. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
” The US Supreme Court in Golan v Holder has recognised that “some restriction on expression is the inherent and intended effect of every grant of copyright. [read post]