Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 2221 - 2240 of 4,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:54 am by Gabe Johnson-Karp
  Perhaps the most notable advocate of such a system in the United States was Justice William O. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
A Staten Island Probate Lawyer said the first exception, as stated in the affirmative, is that the sister-state judgment, decree or order must be 'entitled to full faith and credit in this state within the meaning of Article IV, Section 1 of the United States Constitution which mandates that Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the judicial proceedings of every other State. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:08 am by Scott Birkey
Under the Constitutions of the United States and California, the Powells filed an action for just compensation from the County. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:33 pm
Does that alter the analysis? [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
A similar but much more expansive point has been made in the United States, by legal scholar Randy Barnett, who has repeatedly argued for a converse “presumption of liberty” where state action challenges the personal liberty of individuals. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:33 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” If the answer is affirmative, the DNI must report how many such searches were conducted; When the United States first began relying upon FISA to support collection of information of “large numbers of United States persons with no known connection to suspicious activity[;]“ Whether the government’s statements to the Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]