Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 2221 - 2240 of 6,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by John Jenkins
Now this Shearman & Sterling blog reports that the Acting Solicitor General is asking the US Supreme Court to review whether state courts still have jurisdiction over these suits: On May 23, 2017, the Acting Solicitor General filed a brief on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae urging the Supreme Court to grant the petition for a writ of certiorari in Cyan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm by Levin Papantonio
Levin Papantonio Rafferty (LPR) attorneys fighting to hold social media companies accountable for recommending harmful content or supporting acts of international terrorism by hosting terrorist content filed amici curiae (friends of the court) briefs with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 7:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 645-48 (Blackmun, J., dissenting). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:58 am by Cyrus Farivar
That choice makes sense as the city has been the site of famous patent cases (see: Apple v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 8:41 am by Anthony Franze and Jeremy McLaughlin
  The states and United States argue that, so long as the defendant has not been deprived a fair and reliable trial, there is no prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Robert Chesney
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:32 am by Jonathan Bailey
Google is no longer seen as a hero, especially outside the United States. [read post]
Banks also recently wrote an essay for Stanford Lawyer about the unanimous decision, which held that state-mandated segregation of public schools violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]