Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 7,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
See United Public Workers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am
Congress decided that not every person who wishes to enter into the United States gets to do so at will. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
The provision empowers the president to “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens” if he “finds” that entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:19 am
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:11 am
Justice Sotomayor dissents in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:22 am
Then-candidate Trump also stated that “Islam hates us” and asserted that the United States was “having problems with Muslims coming into the country. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
(See Fairbank v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
In Abbott v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first of three installments of draft guidance intended to protect against “potential attacks” on the United States’ food supply. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
While those cases still permeate state and federal courts, large event-driven litigation has become much more common than it was. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
At the outset, the court noted that Wisconsin was among the minority of United States jurisdictions that adhered to the Building Permit Rule: a brightline rule vesting the right to use property consistent with current zoning at the time a building permit application that strictly conforms to all applicable zoning regulations is filed. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:17 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:00 pm
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
