Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 2221 - 2240
of 3,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
_________________________________________________ United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 9:17 am
" Texas accomplished this unrepentant bit of business despite a 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court styled Atkins v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 8:12 am
Panetti's case, Panetti v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Tim Edgar examined the Schrems v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
The right of abortion is one of the most contentious political and legal issues in the United States today. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am
Besides, while states should give citizens greater voice, making that shared voice a moral good precludes the very question at issue: Ought this be a people? [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. . . . [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
In a statement he read in court, Jokić stated he had a moral and personal obligation to accept responsibility and to ask forgiveness for the acts of his subordinates: "The fact that these lives were lost in the area for which I was responsible will remain etched in my consciousness for the rest of my life. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 7:22 am
In Part 6, we discussed how the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is seeking comments on how it could adjust or eliminate tariffs to help the United States in fighting the coronavirus. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:58 pm
The United States didn’t invent slavery. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
” This universal recognition of the equal dignity of all human personality is what, said King, made segregation and racism morally wrong. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case – Owen Dean’s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 – Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
HM (Iraq) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1536 (13 December 2011) December 13, 2011 Iraq country guidance immigration tribunal decision quashed as 2 parties not represented. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
31 May 2019, 10:53 am
Thanks to Jacobson, the Rollins case seems to have become an important example of Italians or at least Sicilians having only "provisional" whiteness in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
United States (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) (IPBiz) (IPBiz) (PatLit) CAFC: Another means-plus-function opinion: General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
