Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 2221 - 2240 of 9,859
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 10:58 am by Jeffrey Bellin
Looking for a clear rule Caroline Flynn, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm by Rick E. Rayl
United States, while the Court held that the property owner has the right to make a takings argument, the Court did NOT conclude that a taking had in fact occurred. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm by jbyrne
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Filarsky v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 9:18 pm
The United States Supreme Court indicated Friday that it will decide a case that comes close to the very fundamental question of whether justice and a court can be bought. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm by Lee Davis
United States, dealt with the authority of police officers to detain those who leave a residence that officers have come to search.In an earlier case, Michigan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:56 am by Ben Rubin
As reported by our colleague Robert Thomas on inversecondemnation.com, the California Supreme Court granted the California Building Industry Association's (CBIA) petition for review in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Kara Loewentheil, Satanists, Scott Walker, & Contraception: A Partial Account of Hobby Lobby's Implications for State Law, (Harvard Law & Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, Forthcoming).Robert J. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm by Rodger Citron
Instead, they appealed and the United States Court of Appeals reversed the district court. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Erin Napoleon
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]