Search for: "WASHINGTON V. STATE" Results 2221 - 2240 of 17,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 12:08 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, a closely watched case involving issues similar to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
 Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:10 pm by Victoria VanBuren
” The piece appears in 67 Washington and Lee Law Review 489 (2010). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property PresentsSupreme Court Series:Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:59 am by Conor McEvily
In a blog post for the Washington Post, Ezra Klein discusses Douglas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
The article also presents research from the Powell Archives at Washington and Lee University School of Law.On its face, Powell’s Roe vote is perplexing due to its inconsistency with his stated philosophy of judicial restraint. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the wave of court rulings following the Supreme Court’s July 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
In the case of Green v Pierce Countery, 98768-8, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington held  a man with a YouTube channel does not qualify as a member of the media under the state’s public records law, meaning he is not entitled to certain records that are available to news organizations but otherwise exempt from release to the general public. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:52 am
Division I and Division II of the Washington State Court of Appeals both issued decisions in favor of local governments seeking to comply with the Public Records Act (PRA). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 Reporting on the Puerto Rico decision, the Washington Post points out that the decision "puts the First Circuit back in play in the national litigation, although every state in the circuit already recognizes same-sex marriage. [read post]