Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 4,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
S., at ___ (slip op., at 7), and take his life as well.2. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
"We have considered MPEP(v) and note that all address the issue of enablement of a written description under 35 USC, first paragraph. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
See 562 U. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
(The court refers to her as “Minor” in the opinion and I will do so, as well.)The court then notes that[s]ome of Minor's tweets include laughing emojis and statements like `just kidding. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
In Maximized Living, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:02 am
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
" Hanf v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Nuxoll v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:57 am
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:11 am
Virginia Jahrke v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
See, e.g., Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
See, e.g., Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
Louis U. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:09 pm
Case Citation: Elonis v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Supreme Court’s Stern v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Supreme Court’s Stern v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
The reasonable belief standard would fly in the face of the "clear and convincing" standard of proof established by Congress that defendants must meet to rebut the presumption of validity (see the AmeriKat's posts on Microsoft v i4i). [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Plaintiff contends that [the drug] is the proximate cause of her injuries because, “[u]pon information and belief,” she is a CYP carrier.Mills, 2011 WL 4708850, at *2. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and defendant's commission thereof (CPL 100.15[3] & 100.40[1]; see People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; see also People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]). [read post]
