Search for: "Alling v. United States" Results 2241 - 2260 of 47,766
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 2:25 am
Thomas, on the issue of unconstitutionally excessive statutory damages, a petition for certiorari has been filed with the United States Supreme Court.The petition maintains that a statutory damages award which is 44 times the actual damages is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:50 am
"Between 1803 and 1962, the United States granted a total of some 330,000,000 acres to the States for all purposes. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:14 am by Steven Cohen
United StatesUnited States District Court – District of Alaska – December 1st, 2016) involves medical malpractice. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Ashley Deeks analyzed the unprecedented provision in the UN Security Council Resolution 2249 which condemns ISIS and calls on all U.N. member states “that have the capacity to do so to take all necessary measures, in compliance with international law [...] to redouble and coordinate their efforts to prevent and suppress terrorist acts committed specifically by ISIL. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm by Jeff Kosseff
” If enacted, such a legislative reform would bring the statute into alignment with the 2010 decision of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:53 am by John Elwood
United States, there are only four cases undecided from the October sitting: United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:17 am by Parr Richey Frandsen Patterson Kruse LLP
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently allowed a “patronage capital” lawsuit to continue in federal court after deciding federal loan conditions and requirements may preempt state laws.[1] One of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture is the Rural Utilities Service (RUS). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am by Sarah Cleveland
  And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Court concluded that the Constitution’s Suspension Clause did not apply to the petitioner because the right he was seeking—to remain in the United States under the nation’s immigration laws—fell outside the historical core of the Suspension Clause, which was limited to challenging detention as such. [read post]