Search for: "Browning v. State" Results 2241 - 2260 of 8,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm by Terry Lenamon
  Terry Lenamon’s List of Major United States Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases:Furman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" Where these three factors are present, this issue should be addressed by a criminal court as an exception to the mootness doctrine as held in People v Brown, People v Mejia, Matter of Crystal AA and Wagner v Infante. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:14 am by Joe Koncelik
 Region V covers Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Indiana and Minnesota. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Erin Miller
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. (09-683) and Amara v. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Brown states that “[e]xposure to even a minuscule amount of asbestos can cause lung problems, according to scientists. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
The story of how we got to Roe, like the story of how we got to Brown v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:55 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
Check Photo Attorney on Lynda.comYou just finished reading Civil v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Lauren Millward, Solicitor, Browne Jacobson LLP In recent times trade mark law in the UK has developed to comply with the fundamental principles of the EU including the free movement of goods and services within the EU. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority  (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]