Search for: "DOES 1-100" Results 2241 - 2260 of 14,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 12:42 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As part of the civics examination a USCIS Officer asks the applicant up to 10 of 100 possible civics questions. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm by Steven Boutwell
The new 1-hour standard is met when the 3-year average of the 99th percentile of daily maximum 1-hour averages at each monitor does not exceed 75 ppb. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:10 pm by Steven Koprince
”  OHA continued, “[Tenax] does not argue that [Investors 1 and 4] do not share a common purpose or do not invest together in eight firms. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:05 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
  However, the SCOTUS reversed that line of cases today by denying this deduction on the Means Test to anyone who does not have the ownership expense.What does this mean for you? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:39 am by Lawrence Solum
Peppers, and Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court, by Artemus Ward and David L. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm by Ronald N. Hoffman
This does mean that the driver is 100% guilty of a DUI, nor does it mean that the driver was in fact intoxicated, and he or she was operating a vehicle while intoxicated. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:26 am by Matt Osenga
  Thus, the PTO is expected to contribute $100 million in user fees to the general federal budget. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:33 pm
" While this language does not specifically mention a claim in intervention, neither does it limit the term to a plaintiff's "claim. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
On both a federal and a state level, imposing a VMT tax does require lawmakers to make some hard decisions on trade-offs. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Dean Freeman
A facility that does not have or does not enforce worker safety guidelines is not likely to do so when it comes to patient safety either. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am by Nico Cordes
Allowability of the objection2.1 Legal basis of the objection2.1.1 The appellant has not argued that there was any reason for exclusion under Article 24(1) EPC, nor does the present board see any basis for the application of Article 24(1) EPC either. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  The relevant claims of the patent were as follows:1. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Does it matter if you represent 1 out of 3 as 33%? [read post]