Search for: "Doe 103" Results 2241 - 2260 of 3,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm by Rantanen
  Nor should the effects of Judge Rader's parade of horribles be limited to Section 101 - they strike me as equally applicable to Section 102, Section 103, and especially Section 112. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
Tying an abstract idea to a tangible result or a specific field of endeavor does not make the idea any less abstract. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:04 am by Matt Osenga
Inventors Should Have an Agreement to Take Advantage of 103(c) What does all this mean? [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
The Burton slide, showing a shadowy figure conspicuously holding a piece of paper behind his back, does not support any claim at issue in this case. [read post]
We also don't know what the government does with the information it collects about innocent people through SARs. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am by Rantanen
  Although Section 156(b) limits the effect of the extension, it does not limit the extension to specific claims. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A method of controlling a game apparatus having an operation unit (1106) which makes an operation input to a game, which makes a player operate a falling object (102) that falls within a predetermined display area (100), and clears the falling object (102) and falling stop objects (103) by combining the falling object (102) and the falling stop objects (103) under a predetermined condition, a display unit (1105) which displays information associated with the game, a storage unit… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:08 am by WSLL
The Court found that the statutory provisions at §§ 41-5-102 and 103 and § 41-6-303, contemplate the type of analysis appropriate to determine the expenses requisite to the proper operation, maintenance, and repair of the diversion and canal, as separate from all business expenses Appellee incurred in operating the entire irrigation district system. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:17 pm
An interesting article published by the Huffington Post details the problems California parents can experience when trying to collect California child support from an ex who is a member of one of the state's 103 recognized Native American nations. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:36 am by Dennis Crouch
The district court rejected this argument – holding that, under Pfaff, the on-sale bar does not apply because the claimed invention was not "ready for patenting" at the point of the prior offers for sale. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
Only a misconception of the scope of federal power can result from ignoring this fact, or from assuming that this aspect of our fundamental law does not exist. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
A person committing a prohibited act "with the intent to defraud or mislead" is guilty of a felony punishable by not more than three years or fined not more than $10,000 or both.A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
For the argument to work, it must be the case that the claimed invention actually does differ in the three points identified, and it must also be the case that there were websites which tracked the behaviour of users.[4] In general, when a Search Division has found that no search is to be performed, it is not always necessary for the ED to carry out an “additional search” before raising an inventive step objection. [read post]