Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 13,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2016, 3:48 am
In re Uinta Brewing Company, Serial No. 86333439 (June 29, 2016) [not precedential].There is no per se rule mandating that all alcoholic beverages are deemed similar goods for likelihood of confusion purposes. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:45 pm
It was reconvened and then continued successively in the same manner on October 23, 25, 29, November 1, 5, 7, 8, 13, 16, 19, and 20. [read post]
14 May 2023, 2:14 pm
So I urge district judges again -- it's okay to grant motions to dismiss and Rule 29s! [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:21 am
”http://www.nuigalway.ie/business-public-policy-law/school-of-law/news/school-of-law-annual-distinguished-lecture-2019-1.htmlTCD, Dublin, 4 Oct. 2019:Regulating the Future of Human Work: a Christian Ethics Perspectivehttps://www.tcd.ie/law/news-events/human-work-christian-ethics.phpTCD, Dublin, 12 October 2019:Irish Supreme Court Review - Second Annual Conferencehttps://www.tcd.ie/law/news-events/iscr.phpUCD, Dublin 29 October 2019The Offences Against the State Act at 80:… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:21 am
”http://www.nuigalway.ie/business-public-policy-law/school-of-law/news/school-of-law-annual-distinguished-lecture-2019-1.htmlTCD, Dublin, 4 Oct. 2019:Regulating the Future of Human Work: a Christian Ethics Perspectivehttps://www.tcd.ie/law/news-events/human-work-christian-ethics.phpTCD, Dublin, 12 October 2019:Irish Supreme Court Review - Second Annual Conferencehttps://www.tcd.ie/law/news-events/iscr.phpUCD, Dublin 29 October 2019The Offences Against the State Act at 80:… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:03 am
In re DePorter, Serial No. 87229711 (January 29, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Linda A. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
In particular, and inter alia, this CEIPI Opinion highlights that:(1) Given the uncertainties that researchers face in applying present exceptions and limitations to Text and Data Mining (TDM), a new mandatory exception might drive innovation and bridge the gap with other jurisdictions. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 3:31 am
The Board upheld a refusal to register the design mark shown below, for jewelry and for "Clothing, namely, t-shirts, socks, hoodies" on the ground that under Sections 1, 2 and 45 of the Trademark Act, the proposed mark, as used on the specimens of record, is merely a decorative or ornamental feature of the goods and does not function as a trademark to indicate their source. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:13 pm
For example, the final rule does not apply to: (1) grants; (2) contracts and agreements with and grants to the Indian Tribes; and (3) construction and services contracts that are exempt from coverage under the DBA or the SCA. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 7:07 am
On May 29, 2019, the Governor of Nevada signed into law Senate Bill 220 (“SB 220”), an act relating to Internet privacy and amending Nevada’s existing law requiring websites and online services to post a privacy notice. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:42 am
So in this case, she would have to have a 29% chance of living as a result of the negligence to recover. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:42 am
So in this case, she would have to have a 29% chance of living as a result of the negligence to recover. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:36 pm
"A person is guilty of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property and when: "1. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Section 68.2(1) does not provide a collective infringement remedy.[8] The result was that the Supreme Court found that Access Copyright could not enforce its tariffs against non-licensees, such as York, and, further, since Access Copyright does not have an assignment of copyright from the copyright owners, Access Copyright could not sue York for any alleged infringement. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
Following an unusually heavy calendar last week, the court will hear a total of another 25 arguments — 18 in San Francisco on May 29, 30, and 31, and 7 in Los Angeles on June 5 and 6. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Id. at 26, 28-29. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:37 pm
HB 690 states as follows: (1) "Employee" means individuals employed in Ohio, but does not mean individuals who are excluded from the definition of "employee" under 29 U.S.C. 203(e) or individuals who are exempted from the minimum wage requirements in 29 U.S.C. 213 and from the definition of "employee" in this chapter. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 7:21 am
Was seriously argued that storage and printing out does not constitute reproduction?]. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:58 am
§1658(b)(1). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The Guidelines for examination, E-VIII 1.6, further explain that for any communication raising a matter of substance – such as in the present case – a request for extension, even if filed without reasons, should normally be allowed if the total period set does not thereby exceed six months. [read post]
