Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 11:24 pm
They entered into an ante-nuptial agreement before a notary in Germany three months before the marriage at the instigation of the wife, to whom a further portion of her family’s considerable wealth would be transferred if an agreement was signed. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 8:59 am
Daimler patent infringement cases in Germany as intervenors (the legal requirement for an intervention is that they must be affected as a result of some liability). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Coleman Saunders summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
Indeed a judge or recorder hearing a case may not be aware of a pattern of a misguided litigant (such as Mr Lilley of Lilley v DMG Events Ltd [2014] EWHC 610 (IPEC)) incurring unaffordable fees over various cases. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:39 am
Actually, they might not even be provided with claim charts as the Federal Court of Justice of Germany abolished that requirement this year in Sisvel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo | The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) | Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities | GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
The recent UK Supreme Court case Virgin Atlantic Airway Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (see IPKat here) concerned whether a finding of validity of a patent as between two parties was res judicata even if the patent was subsequently revoked. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
The Applicants also sought to rely on the CJEU decision in Breyer v Federal Republic of Germany (Case C-582/14) in support of the argument that the court should order Virgin Media to disclose data regarding its relevant customers (presumably because the data requested would be “means reasonably likely to be used” to identify the alleged infringers).The judge dealt with these arguments swiftly. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
19 May 2022, 11:04 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:28 am
Haier that is pending before the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:33 am
Creech, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
With similar patent infringement proceedings and/or disputes commenced in Germany, France, Australia and the in the US (there against InterDigital), Vringo contended that it was the terms of the global offer that was the real dispute between the parties. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:23 am
But in this Nokia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:24 pm
Also, there's an obscure Thales v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:17 am
But then came the CJEU (in Huawei v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 10:38 am
Matthias Zigann noted at a K.Mizra v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:57 am
The UCL debate on the UK Supreme Court decision Actavis v Eli Lilly ("Equivalents: K = Na. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
Of course, the Commission could have taken forceful measures against Samsung and Google if it had been willing to take the risk of the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
