Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 2241 - 2260
of 7,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
· In Convolve v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 7:53 am
State, 2013 WL 5636375 (Tex. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
For those who served at Navy Appellate Defense during the 1990's (or I suppose Appellate Government, or Code 40, or Code 20, or NMCCA, oops and CAAF), the case United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:44 pm
(V) Solicitation to commit murder as defined in Section 653f. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:05 pm
By Brian Russell Nick v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The case is Villalpando v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 6:17 am
Dunbar v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:33 am
The details appear below: * United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:46 pm
Just several hours ago, Bermudez was released on parole from Soledad State Prison. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 10:14 am
While most states hold that “reasonable” non-compete agreements are valid and enforceable, this is not true in California. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
California’s Congested HighwaysComing in second, California’s bustling cities and ports have contributed to a total of 13,292 large truck accidents. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 6:54 am
E Clampus Vitus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm
The plaintiff had strong connections to both British Columbia and California, the latter also being the location of the defendant and all of its documents. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:39 pm
Whether the guy's drinking more nowadays; hey, your guess is at good as mine. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
Moreover, there is a good reason for this view. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:22 pm
HIF BIO v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Perry v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple was in such a hurry that it immediately appealed the denial of a sales ban, but as I wrote on Thursday (when I reported on Apple's motion for postjudgment royalties of $6.46 per device that infringes the three patents underlying the liability findings), all the appeals relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
